Information on Result #3026845
There is no (80, 165, 192)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (80, 164, 192)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 26 990097 305439 081249 137755 522680 366028 772618 603871 > 2164 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.