Information on Result #3026940
There is no (81, 126, 434)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (81, 125, 434)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 44 010205 011145 650380 802166 885599 548112 > 2125 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.