Information on Result #3026978
There is no (81, 192, 166)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (81, 191, 166)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3241 993694 002298 476470 073562 116736 890791 551883 642992 510240 > 2191 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.