Information on Result #3026979
There is no (81, 194, 165)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (81, 193, 165)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14151 447588 218191 130469 620151 017381 449041 440029 516645 356112 > 2193 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.