Information on Result #3027071
There is no (82, 165, 204)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (82, 164, 204)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27 097609 928180 228136 086694 934662 947093 915640 634650 > 2164 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.