Information on Result #3027181
There is no (83, 164, 212)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (83, 163, 212)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12 257184 037477 093310 412480 381587 738329 731901 456140 > 2163 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.