Information on Result #3027430
There is no (85, 222, 163)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (85, 221, 163)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 425861 073854 504985 661430 469423 396476 639149 964328 115044 753191 687872 > 2221 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.