Information on Result #3027530
There is no (86, 209, 173)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (86, 208, 173)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 514 264642 282427 767385 845585 889643 856003 214661 432017 305006 376112 > 2208 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.