Information on Result #3027841
There is no (89, 222, 175)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (89, 221, 175)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 693912 222169 356181 752637 149859 117606 374896 492786 022978 513556 174638 > 2221 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.