Information on Result #3027855
There is no (89, 251, 129)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (89, 250, 129)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2250, 129, S2, 2, 161), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 57896 044618 658097 711785 492504 343953 926634 992332 820282 019728 792003 956564 819968 / 27 > 2250 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.