Information on Result #3027952
There is no (90, 247, 169)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (90, 246, 169)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 142 349004 649126 397271 754774 108380 864489 760359 620687 984736 420517 660971 704800 > 2246 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.