Information on Result #3028411
There is no (95, 228, 191)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (95, 227, 191)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 229 528865 379771 864286 763671 018508 204192 041578 714043 221408 654509 870198 > 2227 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.