Information on Result #3028781
There is no (99, 228, 206)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (99, 227, 206)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 260 457488 698396 597155 878714 151251 440135 853375 918610 019492 179045 920967 > 2227 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.