Information on Result #3033490
There is no (160, 215, 2618)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (160, 214, 2618)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 26594 798964 957440 595734 007991 225301 165671 948199 958264 789656 721308 > 2214 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.