Information on Result #3033654
There is no (163, 212, 4309)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (163, 211, 4309)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3292 554903 649291 767034 506346 293254 505651 811513 845689 845799 625896 > 2211 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.