Information on Result #3033661
There is no (163, 226, 1856)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (163, 225, 1856)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 54 568790 353272 166071 175298 581890 202529 070092 336215 175065 825439 050221 > 2225 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.