Information on Result #3033763
There is no (165, 214, 4568)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (165, 213, 4568)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13216 847207 609169 628692 977251 993310 458980 361203 804403 338845 475848 > 2213 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.