Information on Result #3041379
There is no (21, 44, 170)-net in base 3, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (21, 43, 170)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 334 826696 540272 119777 > 343 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.