Information on Result #3044871
There is no (40, 87, 265)-net in base 3, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (40, 86, 265)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 108449 707729 392554 003526 355760 957400 508779 > 386 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.