Information on Result #3106672
There is no (21, 90, 512)-net in base 9, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (21, 89, 512)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8 514899 868098 919737 188437 403260 021915 820538 327097 196753 215976 600927 581822 321924 399105 > 989 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.