Information on Result #3106675
There is no (21, 96, 494)-net in base 9, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (21, 95, 494)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 4 509814 877842 606454 644475 482735 572696 739445 516439 411679 688847 706314 821760 046937 239254 121905 > 995 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.