Information on Result #3107010
There is no (26, 65, 1613)-net in base 9, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (26, 64, 1613)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11 927048 489324 639717 144445 713430 667309 775552 313144 290690 053625 > 964 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.