Information on Result #3107462
There is no (33, 88, 1606)-net in base 9, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (33, 87, 1606)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 104755 501196 370761 197425 147233 163692 249917 606574 850774 730928 342160 623854 271545 394641 > 987 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.