Information on Result #3107597
There is no (35, 112, 1128)-net in base 9, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (35, 111, 1128)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8344 133830 837454 821013 405016 005237 511510 976283 607503 668095 044656 667668 880207 952221 244663 777044 547733 014145 > 9111 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.