Information on Result #3144111
There is no digital (30, 141, 99)-net over F3, because 48 times m-reduction would yield digital (30, 93, 99)-net over F3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(393, 99, F3, 63) (dual of [99, 6, 64]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(330, 35, F3, 21) (dual of [35, 5, 22]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(39, 13, F3, 7) (dual of [13, 4, 8]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(38, 12, F3, 6) (dual of [12, 4, 7]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(39, 13, F3, 7) (dual of [13, 4, 8]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(330, 35, F3, 21) (dual of [35, 5, 22]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.