Information on Result #3149379
There is no digital (55, 230, 230)-net over F4, because 7 times m-reduction would yield digital (55, 223, 230)-net over F4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4223, 230, F4, 168) (dual of [230, 7, 169]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(455, 61, F4, 42) (dual of [61, 6, 43]-code), but
- 2 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(453, 59, F4, 40) (dual of [59, 6, 41]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(413, 18, F4, 10) (dual of [18, 5, 11]-code), but
- “Liz†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(413, 18, F4, 10) (dual of [18, 5, 11]-code), but
- 2 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(453, 59, F4, 40) (dual of [59, 6, 41]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(455, 61, F4, 42) (dual of [61, 6, 43]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.