Information on Result #3153194
There is no digital (3, 72, 148)-net over F25, because 2 times m-reduction would yield digital (3, 70, 148)-net over F25, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(2570, 148, F25, 67) (dual of [148, 78, 68]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- OA(2569, 73, S25, 67), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 24178 564222 846123 668546 399721 917528 895562 151649 914153 732205 158997 548011 257094 913162 291049 957275 390625 / 7242 > 2569 [i]
- linear OA(2578, 148, F25, 75) (dual of [148, 70, 76]-code), but
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(2578, 103, F25, 75) (dual of [103, 25, 76]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(253, 27, S25, 3), but
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(2578, 103, F25, 75) (dual of [103, 25, 76]-code), but
- OA(2569, 73, S25, 67), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.