Information on Result #3275328
(29, 65, 516)-net in base 128, using 1 times m-reduction based on (29, 66, 516)-net in base 128, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- (4, 22, 258)-net in base 128, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (4, 24, 258)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 21, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 21, 258)-net over F256, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (4, 24, 258)-net in base 128, using
- (7, 44, 258)-net in base 128, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (7, 48, 258)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 42, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 42, 258)-net over F256, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (7, 48, 258)-net in base 128, using
- (4, 22, 258)-net in base 128, using
Mode: Constructive.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.