Information on Result #3279175
(133, 173, 1092)-net in base 8, using 81 times duplication based on (132, 172, 1092)-net in base 8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- (36, 56, 516)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (22, 42, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 21, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 21, 258)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (22, 42, 516)-net over F16, using
- (76, 116, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (18, 58, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 63, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 54, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 54, 288)-net over F128, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 63, 288)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (18, 58, 288)-net in base 64, using
- (36, 56, 516)-net in base 8, using
Mode: Constructive.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.