Information on Result #334455
There is no OOA(221, 66, S2, 5, 9), because 2 times depth reduction would yield OOA(221, 66, S2, 3, 9), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield OOA(220, 66, S2, 2, 8), but
- the generalized Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that M ≥ 1 060544 > 220 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.