Information on Result #464116
There is no (165, 167, large)-net in base 2, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (165, 168, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (165, 169, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (165, 170, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (165, 171, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (165, 172, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (165, 173, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (165, 174, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (165, 175, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (165, 176, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (165, 177, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (165, 178, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (165, 179, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (165, 180, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 14 | No (165, 181, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 15 | No (165, 182, large)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||