Information on Result #464152

There is no (201, 203, large)-net in base 2, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (201, 204, large)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (201, 205, large)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (201, 206, large)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (201, 207, large)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (201, 208, large)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (201, 209, large)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (201, 210, large)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (201, 211, large)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (201, 212, large)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (201, 213, large)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (201, 214, large)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (201, 215, large)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (201, 216, large)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (201, 217, large)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (201, 218, large)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (201, 219, large)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (201, 220, large)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (201, 221, large)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (201, 222, large)-net in base 2 [i]