Information on Result #464153

There is no (202, 204, large)-net in base 2, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (202, 205, large)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (202, 206, large)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (202, 207, large)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (202, 208, large)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (202, 209, large)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (202, 210, large)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (202, 211, large)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (202, 212, large)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (202, 213, large)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (202, 214, large)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (202, 215, large)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (202, 216, large)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (202, 217, large)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (202, 218, large)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (202, 219, large)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (202, 220, large)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (202, 221, large)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (202, 222, large)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (202, 223, large)-net in base 2 [i]