Information on Result #464160

There is no (209, 211, large)-net in base 2, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (209, 212, large)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (209, 213, large)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (209, 214, large)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (209, 215, large)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (209, 216, large)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (209, 217, large)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (209, 218, large)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (209, 219, large)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (209, 220, large)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (209, 221, large)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (209, 222, large)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (209, 223, large)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (209, 224, large)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (209, 225, large)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (209, 226, large)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (209, 227, large)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (209, 228, large)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (209, 229, large)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (209, 230, large)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (209, 231, large)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (209, 232, large)-net in base 2 [i]