Information on Result #464162

There is no (211, 213, large)-net in base 2, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (211, 214, large)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (211, 215, large)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (211, 216, large)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (211, 217, large)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (211, 218, large)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (211, 219, large)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (211, 220, large)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (211, 221, large)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (211, 222, large)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (211, 223, large)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (211, 224, large)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (211, 225, large)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (211, 226, large)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (211, 227, large)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (211, 228, large)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (211, 229, large)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (211, 230, large)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (211, 231, large)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (211, 232, large)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (211, 233, large)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (211, 234, large)-net in base 2 [i]