Information on Result #464163

There is no (212, 214, large)-net in base 2, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (212, 215, large)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (212, 216, large)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (212, 217, large)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (212, 218, large)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (212, 219, large)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (212, 220, large)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (212, 221, large)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (212, 222, large)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (212, 223, large)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (212, 224, large)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (212, 225, large)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (212, 226, large)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (212, 227, large)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (212, 228, large)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (212, 229, large)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (212, 230, large)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (212, 231, large)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (212, 232, large)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (212, 233, large)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (212, 234, large)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (212, 235, large)-net in base 2 [i]