Information on Result #464166

There is no (215, 217, large)-net in base 2, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (215, 218, large)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (215, 219, large)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (215, 220, large)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (215, 221, large)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (215, 222, large)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (215, 223, large)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (215, 224, large)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (215, 225, large)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (215, 226, large)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (215, 227, large)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (215, 228, large)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (215, 229, large)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (215, 230, large)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (215, 231, large)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (215, 232, large)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (215, 233, large)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (215, 234, large)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (215, 235, large)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (215, 236, large)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (215, 237, large)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (215, 238, large)-net in base 2 [i]