Information on Result #464173

There is no (222, 224, large)-net in base 2, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (222, 225, large)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (222, 226, large)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (222, 227, large)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (222, 228, large)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (222, 229, large)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (222, 230, large)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (222, 231, large)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (222, 232, large)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (222, 233, large)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (222, 234, large)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (222, 235, large)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (222, 236, large)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (222, 237, large)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (222, 238, large)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (222, 239, large)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (222, 240, large)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (222, 241, large)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (222, 242, large)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (222, 243, large)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (222, 244, large)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (222, 245, large)-net in base 2 [i]