Information on Result #464179

There is no (228, 230, large)-net in base 2, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (228, 231, large)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (228, 232, large)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (228, 233, large)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (228, 234, large)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (228, 235, large)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (228, 236, large)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (228, 237, large)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (228, 238, large)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (228, 239, large)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (228, 240, large)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (228, 241, large)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (228, 242, large)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (228, 243, large)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (228, 244, large)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (228, 245, large)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (228, 246, large)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (228, 247, large)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (228, 248, large)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (228, 249, large)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (228, 250, large)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (228, 251, large)-net in base 2 [i]
22No (228, 252, large)-net in base 2 [i]
23No (228, 253, large)-net in base 2 [i]