Information on Result #464191

There is no (240, 242, large)-net in base 2, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (240, 243, large)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (240, 244, large)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (240, 245, large)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (240, 246, large)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (240, 247, large)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (240, 248, large)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (240, 249, large)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (240, 250, large)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (240, 251, large)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (240, 252, large)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (240, 253, large)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (240, 254, large)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (240, 255, large)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (240, 256, large)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (240, 257, large)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (240, 258, large)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (240, 259, large)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (240, 260, large)-net in base 2 [i]