Information on Result #464296
There is no (86, 88, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (86, 89, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (86, 90, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (86, 91, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (86, 92, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (86, 93, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (86, 94, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (86, 95, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (86, 96, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (86, 97, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (86, 98, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (86, 99, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (86, 100, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (86, 101, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||