Information on Result #464312

There is no (102, 104, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (102, 105, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (102, 106, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (102, 107, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (102, 108, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (102, 109, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (102, 110, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (102, 111, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (102, 112, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (102, 113, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (102, 114, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (102, 115, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (102, 116, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (102, 117, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (102, 118, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (102, 119, large)-net in base 3 [i]