Information on Result #464312
There is no (102, 104, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (102, 105, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (102, 106, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
3 | No (102, 107, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
4 | No (102, 108, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
5 | No (102, 109, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
6 | No (102, 110, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
7 | No (102, 111, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
8 | No (102, 112, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
9 | No (102, 113, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
10 | No (102, 114, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
11 | No (102, 115, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
12 | No (102, 116, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
13 | No (102, 117, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
14 | No (102, 118, large)-net in base 3 | [i] | ||
15 | No (102, 119, large)-net in base 3 | [i] |