Information on Result #464313

There is no (103, 105, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (103, 106, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (103, 107, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (103, 108, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (103, 109, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (103, 110, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (103, 111, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (103, 112, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (103, 113, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (103, 114, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (103, 115, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (103, 116, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (103, 117, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (103, 118, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (103, 119, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (103, 120, large)-net in base 3 [i]