Information on Result #464320

There is no (110, 112, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (110, 113, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (110, 114, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (110, 115, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (110, 116, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (110, 117, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (110, 118, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (110, 119, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (110, 120, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (110, 121, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (110, 122, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (110, 123, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (110, 124, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (110, 125, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (110, 126, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (110, 127, large)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (110, 128, large)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (110, 129, large)-net in base 3 [i]