Information on Result #464324

There is no (114, 116, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (114, 117, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (114, 118, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (114, 119, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (114, 120, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (114, 121, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (114, 122, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (114, 123, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (114, 124, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (114, 125, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (114, 126, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (114, 127, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (114, 128, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (114, 129, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (114, 130, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (114, 131, large)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (114, 132, large)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (114, 133, large)-net in base 3 [i]