Information on Result #464326

There is no (116, 118, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 119, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (116, 120, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (116, 121, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (116, 122, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (116, 123, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (116, 124, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (116, 125, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (116, 126, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (116, 127, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (116, 128, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (116, 129, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (116, 130, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (116, 131, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (116, 132, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (116, 133, large)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (116, 134, large)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (116, 135, large)-net in base 3 [i]