Information on Result #464330

There is no (120, 122, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (120, 123, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (120, 124, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (120, 125, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (120, 126, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (120, 127, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (120, 128, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (120, 129, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (120, 130, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (120, 131, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (120, 132, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (120, 133, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (120, 134, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (120, 135, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (120, 136, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (120, 137, large)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (120, 138, large)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (120, 139, large)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (120, 140, large)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (120, 141, large)-net in base 3 [i]