Information on Result #464335

There is no (125, 127, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (125, 128, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (125, 129, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (125, 130, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (125, 131, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (125, 132, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (125, 133, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (125, 134, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (125, 135, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (125, 136, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (125, 137, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (125, 138, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (125, 139, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (125, 140, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (125, 141, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (125, 142, large)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (125, 143, large)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (125, 144, large)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (125, 145, large)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (125, 146, large)-net in base 3 [i]