Information on Result #464337

There is no (127, 129, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (127, 130, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (127, 131, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (127, 132, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (127, 133, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (127, 134, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (127, 135, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (127, 136, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (127, 137, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (127, 138, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (127, 139, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (127, 140, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (127, 141, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (127, 142, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (127, 143, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (127, 144, large)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (127, 145, large)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (127, 146, large)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (127, 147, large)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (127, 148, large)-net in base 3 [i]