Information on Result #464338

There is no (128, 130, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (128, 131, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (128, 132, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (128, 133, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (128, 134, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (128, 135, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (128, 136, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (128, 137, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (128, 138, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (128, 139, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (128, 140, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (128, 141, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (128, 142, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (128, 143, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (128, 144, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (128, 145, large)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (128, 146, large)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (128, 147, large)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (128, 148, large)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (128, 149, large)-net in base 3 [i]